COMMENTS OF THE CITIZENS ENERGY TASK FORCE TO COMMISSION’S NOTICE OF INVESTIGATION REGARDING QUADRENNIAL PLANNING PROCESS II
Citizens Energy Task Force (CETF) appreciates the opportunity to provide input regarding the Quadrennial Planning Process generally, and the specific goals, priorities and measurable targets related to the Focus on Energy Program. These comments will address not only some of the questions posed but also decisions made in the first quadrennial planning process that should be revisited.
Phase 1, 2): Should the energy efficiency and renewable resource programs address longer term market changes in addition to short-term goal achievement? If yes, what is the appropriate balance between short-term achievement and longer term market changes.
CETF agrees that both short and longer term market change goals should be considered. Our comments will focus on benefits of a micro-grid, and the need to better consider externalities and carbon reduction in energy policy.
Grid reliability concerns have made grid security a national imperative, whether the concern is based on the threat of cyber or terrorist attack, increases in severe weather or solar flares, human error or interruption by vegetation or wildlife. A comprehensive, three-year Department of Defense (DoD) and Federal Emergency Management Agency study, Brittle Power: Energy Strategy for National Security,1 concluded that relying on massive, complex, and interconnected infrastructures to transmit and deliver power from centralized generation creates unavoidable, and costly, vulnerabilities.
Read the entire document uploaded to the WPSC (docket #5-fe-100). CETF Comments on Quadrennial Planning Process II_03.14.14
Just the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth…….
The March 2014 Wisconsin Energy Cooperative News cover story, Line Litigation; Transmission Opponents Battle On, left out crucial information, which would lead to a very different understanding of the situation.
SOUL of Wisconsin and Citizens Energy Task Force (CETF) believe the way regional transmission is being approved conflicts with existing state policies and statutes, and ignores known reliability and cost-issues associated with sending electricity great distances — no matter if the generation comes from coal or wind. SOUL and CETF further believe the energy infrastructure should be comprehensive, transparent and accountable to ratepayers.
Critical to this is a true understanding of cost and need, and an unbiased comparative analysis of all energy solutions that takes into account impacts on communities, job creation and property.
Read more at Rebuttal to WI Energy Cooperative News Cover Story_March 2014
Net Zero Energy – a goal at Fort Colins, Colorado. Take a look at this visionary concept that brings the future into the present.
The Wisconsin PSC chose to disregard over 550 signatures asking for the PSC to reopen the CapX2020 docket based on new information. It is yet another example of the Wisconsin PSC ignoring the will of the public it is supposed to serve.
The Citizens Energy Task Force recognizes that the issues related to CapX2020 go beyond transmission lines to the heart of the right of the people to be heard. The paternal pat on the head by the Wisconsin PSC is simply unacceptable, especially in light of recent studies that drive home the fact that electrical use is declining. A recent white paper published by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy underscores what Wisconsin citizens have been trying to get the WPSC to acknowledge for the past two years.
So, what is driving the Commissioners of Wisconsin’s PSC to continue to ignore the obvious, continue to disrespect its duty for due diligence, and continue to give a welcomed nod to the transmission line industry? When did the duty to serve the “public” leave the Public Service Commission? To whom does the PSC answer? The public? The transmission line industry? Who really controls Wisconsin’s destiny?
The Citizens Energy Task Force will not step back from the right of the people to hold government accountable. To that end, it has petitioned for intervention in American Transmission Company’s and Xcel Energy’s expected Badger-Coulee Transmission Line Application. CETF contends that CapX2020 and Badger-Coulee are one in the same line, though applied for at different points in time. These applications present each line as independent of any other, when in truth one line creates a dependency on another. State and federal law requires that environmental and financial impacts of dependent acts be considered at the same time since segmenting them would mask the true costs. This is but one of the issues CETF continues to raise.
CETF Badger-Coulee Line Intervenor Status
For all of you who signed the online petition asking the Wisconsin PSC to reopen the CapX2020 docket, CETF thanks you. If you are interested in knowing more about the three commissioners who chose to ignore your concerns, you can read about them here.
Commissioner Phil Montgomery
Commissioner Eric Callisto
Commissioner Ellen Nowak
To comment on how the request to reopen the CapX2020 was ignored, post individual comments on the PSC website docket 5-CE-136 (you will need to set up an account if you don’t already have one) and send emails to:
The Citizens Energy Task Force has contended all along the benefit is to utilities and not ratepayers. A 2009 study about the national impact of adding mass amounts of regional transmission so that electrons could be better traded on the wholesale energy market showed the cost to Midwestern ratepayers was $3.9 billion per year — likely for 30 to 40 years — while Midwestern utilities’ revenue would increase $11.7 billion per year.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see who bears the costs and who gets the benefits. ~ Deb Severson
This lady needs to get a grip. Just because she and her groupies think something is a fact or is right does not make it so. It must be hard for her to understand the word NO… The time she and the groupies take to make boards, commissions, local governments, etc. respond to them increases our taxes. Do they give a rip about that? ~ Retiredone
Read the entire article and comments here.
We are still waiting for the Public Service Commission to be responsive to the public. Retireone – what part of 555 signatures don’t you understand? The people have a right, I would say a duty, to become engaged in the workings of their government. Government’s job is to represent the interests of the people. What would Retiredone have boards, commissions, and local government do rather than stand up for the people they represent?
“We may disagree with the PSC over who needs the power lines and why, but there should be no question that the process to plan and approve energy infrastructure should be transparent, comprehensive, and accountable to the citizens and ratepayers it is meant to serve,” said Debra Severson
Apparently the PSC feels otherwise….. Take a read.
PSC Snubs Citizen Groups_Press Release_Feb 10 2014
“If it gets ignored, shame on the PSC. The validity of the information is real.” ~ Deb Severson, Citizens Energy Task Force
Allison Geyer from the La Crosse Tribune speaks volumes about the Wisconsin PSC. Take a look.
Friday, January 31, 2014
Dear Secretary Huebsch and Deputy Secretary Schoenherr, cc Governor Walker
Thank you again for the time you gave me last Friday to discuss the Request to Reopen the CapX2020 transmission line docket, which was filed on January 9.
In ending our discussion, Secretary Huebsch conveyed he would determine if any statutes prevented the Department of Administration from supporting this request, and he would follow-up with me early this week. As you know, I left messages on Wednesday to facilitate this follow-up. I also took the opportunity to address the issue from the opposite perspective.
In addition to the general role in advising the governor on energy policy and land-use, and its oversight of the State Energy Office, the following statutes seem to justify the DOA’s support, if not intervention:
- 16.004 (4), (5) and (6)
- 16.82 (1), (2) and (3)
- 16.95 (1), (2), (6), (7), (10), and (13)
- 16.9675 (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6)(a)
I also thought it helpful to include….
Read on… the chart from the JCSP Study we discussed ….
It’s really all connected, this opposition to large scale, multiple state transmission line projects. Wisconsin farmers and communities are not the only ones fighting to keep their lives free from towering transmission lines and towers. It’s all about a common sense approach to serving the country’s energy needs. It’s all about conservation and energy efficiency instead of glut. Read this Kansas Star news article on what farmers in Kansas have to say.
Power Line Opponents Surge Against Wind Energy Transmission Line Project